Thursday, April 03, 2008

The Brooklyn Museum's (and my) conflict of interest

I've previously promoted (here and here), and have since submitted an entry for what I believe will be an interesting exhibit, Brooklyn Museum's "Click!", a "crowd-curated" exhibit that solicits photos on the theme of the "changing faces of Brooklyn":

Click!A Crowd-Curated Exhibition

Open Call Begins March 1
www.brooklynmuseum.org/click


However, considering the museum's recently announced plan to honor Bruce Ratner, the developer of the proposed "Atlantic Yards" project in Prospect Heights, Brooklyn, I'm feeling a "conflict of interest." As for why I, and many others, believe that he's a poor choice for the museum, I'll leave you to read a letter that I feel is far better than one I could have produced. Here's a sample:
    To "honor" Ratner because he wants to promote his undeserving project is to deploy the Museum's not-for-profit resources in a highly inappropriate manner. It is disrespectful of the Museum's privileged tax-exempt status afforded to the Museum to serve the public good.
In a nutshell, I'm very reluctant to participate in, let alone, promote what I believe to be a great concept when the board of the museum chooses to bestow an honor on a developer whose signature project would leave a lasting scar on Brooklyn's "changing face."

Today, there will be a protest at the gala:



Unfortunately, I'm out of town and will not be able to participate in the protest.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

BAM's choice to promote Ratner and thereby make his development efforts appear to be aligned with the public good is saddening, reprehensible and disgusting. I'm appalled really.

Richard Nickel, Jr. said...

I too am questioning whether I should have participated. It's too late now, of course, but I find it appalling that they're honoring that dirtbag. My submission too is of a threatened building in Brooklyn - and though Ratner doesn't have a hand in it, I'm sure he would knock it down to make a buck if given the option.